Wednesday, May 6, 2020

The Interpretation Of The Lab Results †MyAssignmenthelp.com

Question: How Results Are Interpreted? Answer: The interpretation of the lab results really begins with clinician requesting the right test for a particular problem being faced. The expectation is that the lab result shall give information which shall support the judgment on subsequent treatment. The actions that clinicians will take hinges on the clinicians understanding of lab result and how to react to the information. The brain-to-brain cycle starts from considering a lab analysis to interpretation and to the clinicians actions. 2 The clinicians using this cycle must be knowledgeable of preanalytical parameters, biochemical tests, biological variation, appropriate time when to have the appropriate sample taken, analytical parameters, accuracy, diagnostic sensitive and specificity, postanalytical parameters, clinical decision limits, failure rates and clinical interpretation. The medical lab test entail analyzing samples of blood, urine and or other body fluids or tissues to better understand the health state of a person. Certain lab test give clear information regarding particular health matter while others give additional general information. The doctor merges information from medical lab tests with the physical examination, health history and additional diagnostic tests like x-rays or ultrasound prior to coming up with the diagnosis. However, learning what the ones lab results imply particularly common blood and urine test is helpful in better understanding more regarding the systems and how the body is functioning. Using an example of blood, the following are critical to interpretation; learning about what a CBC is, learning about cholesterols panels, appreciating what the CMP is, understanding blood glucose tests. 1 Standard Reporting Systems The reporting can either be Manual or electronic. The typical lab report must have specified sections identified by titles. The report will entail title, introduction, procedure, results and discussions/conclusion. These section headings are in boldface when typed in computer. The title usually draw the attention of readers to the reporters work and precisely represents the presented work. 3 The introduction states the purpose of the test in general terms. The procedure indicates the properties or parameters of what is being measured. Results show the findings of the test while the discussion/conclusion presents the findings from the tests, evaluation of objectives, and stating discrepancies. Recommendations Once the tests results have been interpreted and the report is drawn, the person will recommend the possible disease that could be affecting the person and even additional advanced tests that can be carried out for further information. The Process of Issuing the Final Report Laboratory Medicine After completing the report and having given the recommendations, the person reporting must ensure that every issue is taken into consideration by going through the entire report and confirming whether everything is in order and free from omissions. It is only then that the final lab report can be issued to the concerned persons. Discuss the potential for misinterpretation by the requesting practitioner if these processes and policies are not followed Failure by the requesting practitioner can lead to potential misinterpretation if policies and processes are violated. Frequent misinterpretation of lab result happen in daily clinical practice for example, in the analysis of enzymes, hormones, electrolyte in serum or plasma. There are also potential errors in urinalysis and inadequate sampling of blood specimen. Lab results can as well be misinterpreted in presence of EDTA-induced pseudothrombocytenia alongside of irregular immunoglobulins. Sample Report: The Complete Blood Count Sample Report References Gelfand CA, Yi J, Ju G, inventors; Becton, Dickinson, assignee. Method for diagnosing diseases using a protein or degradation product based on half-life. United States patent US 8,735,085. 2014 May 27. Ichise M, inventor; The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York, assignee. Methods for diagnosing diseases and evaluating treatments therefor using pet. United States patent application US 14/178,406. 2014 Feb 12. Squires JH, England E, Mehta K, Wissman RD. The role of imaging in diagnosing diseases of the distal radioulnar joint, triangular fibrocartilage complex, and distal ulna. American Journal of Roentgenology. 2014 Jul;203(1):146-53.

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.